Author Avatar

en-asks

Has5768 Post

Meat Slaughtered by the People of the Book

"We have been eating only halal meat as it is widely accessible in Toronto Canada for the past few years. Lately, our teenage daughters have complained that they have had to refrain from eating at relatives's homes including my parents and siblings who believe christian meat is halal. My daughters feel that we are making things more difficult when others have chosen an easier way, which is supported by a lot of Scholars in North America.every time I check your site for a solution to this, I get more confused because of the difference in opinions, Jazakum Allah Khairan for all your attempts at answering all the questions.  Here's where my confusion comes from: Different opinions were given in the past few years regarding eating meat slaughtered by people of tbe book, in the US, UK, and Canada: 1. Sept 05 the conclusion was made that the meat in the US market is Haram because of "stunning the animal". 2. June 04 Sheikh Kutty noted that we can eat meat butchered by people of the book, but if find meat provided by muslims we should seek the latter. 3. In another Fatwa, Sheikh Kutty notes that zabihah of the people of the book is permitted in Canada as Canadian Government inspectors make sure that animals that die from stunning are not used for zabihah. My question is mostly for Canadian meat, does Sheikh Kutty or other respected Scholars continue to feel the same? Or has anything changed in the way Canadians slaughter the animals since 2004? Another concern is that Sheikh Kutty noted that we should eat halal meat when available. Does this mean the non-halal meat is only permissible in areas where the halal meat is not accessible? This is not usually the case in Canada especially in large cities. " Jazakum Allah Khairan

Eternity of Punishment for the Disbelievers

Dear Respected Scholars in Islam,Assalamu Alaikum, Until recently I have usually felt confident discussing Islamic beliefs with non-Muslims. However there is one issue that I am not able to explain to satisfy my own reason or heart. This is the belief of ?eternal? punishment for the disbelievers. It does not seem fair to punish a disbeliever for eternity, I can understand a very long period of time, but eternal punishment (even if it  was only one disbeliever) is a horror difficult to contemplate or rationalise against the All-Merciful (whose Mercy overcomes His Anger).Even, if a disbeliever underwent punishment in hell-fire even for a million years for every millisecond of his or her disbelief, then this would be understandable, but then this would be still a grain of sand compared to the never ending beach of eternal punishment. We know that even the lightest levels of Hell have unimaginable punishments. All of Islamic law is based upon proportionality and justice in this world, but this does not seem to apply to the crime of disbelief (as all other Sins can be forgiven after punishment). Although there are many descriptions in the Qur?an and Hadith regarding the nature of afterlife, I know it is dangerous to contemplate the issues regarding the unseen;  however the only way I can reconcile this issue with the beauty of Islam would be to say that disbelievers, though they will never taste the fruits of Paradise for their crime of Shirk, will undergo a unimaginably long punishment (within which they are neither dead or alive) and after which they will either cease to exist or perhaps a live never a ending existence that will neither be the severe torture of Hell nor the joys of Jannah. Please, I do not mean to offend with this question nor question Allah?s limitless mercy and forgiveness, I ask it in the utmost sincerity and zeal to seek the truth.JazakAllah,Allah Knows Best.Is it undoubtable according to Islamic text that people will suffer punishment for eternity, or are the words used in decribing the hereafter describing a very long period of time or even a indefinite period of time.