The decision by Egypt to build a steel wall along its border with the Gaza Strip has sparked widespread concern about its impact on Palestinians. Framed under the guise of national security, this action raises critical questions from an Islamic perspective regarding the duty of Muslim nations to support each other, especially in times of crisis. This article delves into the Shari`ah stance on nationalism, Muslim unity, and the responsibility to aid the Palestinian cause.
The Islamic Duty of Unity and Support for Fellow Muslims
Islam calls for unity and solidarity among Muslims, emphasizing the importance of supporting fellow believers in times of need. The Qur’an and Sunnah underscore the duty of Muslims to help one another, particularly the oppressed. Unfortunately, nationalism has often undermined this essential sense of brotherhood, leading to division within the Muslim Ummah and, in some cases, actions that harm fellow Muslims.
The Steel Wall and Its Consequences
The construction of the steel wall along the Gaza border is viewed as exacerbating the already harsh conditions for Palestinians. With Gaza under siege and suffering from the effects of the blockade, this wall may further isolate the region. In Islamic jurisprudence, actions that contribute to the oppression of fellow Muslims are prohibited. The construction of the wall raises concerns about Egypt’s role in worsening the situation, rather than alleviating the suffering of the Palestinians.
The Role of Egypt in the Muslim World
Historically, Egypt has been a key player in the Muslim Ummah and is expected to support the Palestinian cause. With close historical ties to Gaza, Egypt has a unique responsibility to assist in alleviating the suffering of its people. Instead of contributing to the blockade, Egypt should stand in solidarity with the Palestinians and offer support to ease their hardships.
National Security or Nationalism?
While every nation has the right to protect its borders, the justification for building the wall based on national security raises questions. The closure of the Rafah crossing, a vital route for Gazans, has already led to worsening conditions. The real security threat is not the people of Gaza, who are struggling to survive, but the ongoing blockade that deprives them of basic needs. The wall, then, may not address real security concerns, but rather contribute to further isolating Gaza and deepening its humanitarian crisis.
The Broader Implications for Egypt’s Reputation
Beyond its effects on Gaza, the construction of the wall has broader implications for Egypt’s reputation. The international community, particularly human rights organizations, may view Egypt’s actions as complicit in exacerbating the suffering of Palestinians. This could damage Egypt’s standing among Arab and Muslim nations, who may see this as a betrayal of the Palestinian cause.
The Role of the Muslim Ummah
This situation underscores the divisions within the Muslim Ummah. Nationalism and individualism have often clouded the collective responsibility to support fellow Muslims. The unity demonstrated by nations such as Turkey and Iran in their support for Palestine highlights the importance of collaboration in times of crisis. Muslim nations must prioritize collective action and unity over nationalism in addressing the challenges faced by the Ummah.
Conclusion
Egypt’s decision to build a steel wall along the Gaza border raises significant concerns from both a humanitarian and Islamic perspective. The construction of the wall could worsen the suffering of Palestinians and damage Egypt’s reputation within the Muslim world. It is imperative that Muslim nations prioritize unity, cooperation, and solidarity in supporting the Palestinian cause. Only through collective action and a commitment to the principles of justice and brotherhood can the Muslim Ummah address the challenges faced by its members, especially in regions like Gaza.